• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Terry Haydn

  • Home
  • About
  • Learning to Teach History
    • PGCE Student Teacher
    • ICT in History Teaching
    • Time and Chronology
    • Assessment
    • History and Citizenship
    • Evidence
    • Causation
    • Substantive concepts
    • Empathy
    • Drama and Role-Play
    • Significance
    • Values and dispositions in school history
    • Class management
    • Interpretations
    • History and newspapers
    • Purpose of School History
    • Inclusion and diversity
      • Parent’s story
      • Claire’s full story
    • CPD
  • Managing Pupil Behaviour
    • The Haydn Scale and ‘The Right to Learn’
    • Levels of Control
    • Links to the research
    • How to get the class quiet; what do teachers say?
    • ‘Coping’; how do teachers handle things when they are not in complete control?
    • It isn’t quick or easy…
    • Sending pupils out; what do teachers say?
    • Moving pupils; what do teachers say?
    • Classroom rules; what do teachers say?
    • Why do some teachers become better than others at managing pupil behaviour? What do teachers say?
    • Complex and sophisticated skills
    • Mistakes: what do mentors say?
    • Zero tolerance: what (some) heads and deputies say…
    • Some of the Variables that influence Classroom Climate
    • Refusal
    • What use is the Scale?
    • Links to Other Useful Resources
  • NEET in Norfolk
  • Pupil Disaffection
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / PGCE History at UEA / Time and Chronology / Should pupils learn the dates of important events in British History? / Ben Walsh, Textbook author and Historical Association Secondary Committee

Ben Walsh, Textbook author and Historical Association Secondary Committee

It seems to me that it would be a scandal for only 4% to know these dates if what we were trying to teach them was these dates. But we are not. History teachers have made a conscious decision in the last 2 decades to follow the paths being blazed by academic historians. They do not ask when the Battle of Waterloo was. They ask why Britain defeated France in a long and gruelling war. Does the Daily Express have a view on this issue? If we are limited in memory capacity, as some of out students are, what is essential? If, taking an extreme example, a student can only remember one thing – what is the key fact? Is it the date of the Battle or the result?

The other area of your piece which I would pick up on is that dates and chronology should be the servant and not the master. The house of 1900 had no television, no computer etc. The house of 2000 does. What really matters here? Should students learn that houses in 1900 had no TV? Or should they learn that there has been amazing technological change in the 20th century and a lot of this change has dramatically affected the home? Few would regard David Starkey’s recent programmes on Elizabeth 1 as flimsy or unhistorical, yet what proportion of these has been devoted to dates. If we sort out the difference between dates and developments, while recognising that dates help us to chart developments, we may move on from sterile exploitation of random samples of people who have forgotten particular dates.

Copyright © 2025 | Terry Haydn | All Rights Reserved