• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Terry Haydn

  • Home
  • About
  • Learning to Teach History
    • PGCE Student Teacher
    • ICT in History Teaching
    • Time and Chronology
    • Assessment
    • History and Citizenship
    • Evidence
    • Causation
    • Substantive concepts
    • Empathy
    • Drama and Role-Play
    • Significance
    • Values and dispositions in school history
    • Class management
    • Interpretations
    • History and newspapers
    • Purpose of School History
    • Inclusion and diversity
      • Parent’s story
      • Claire’s full story
    • CPD
  • Managing Pupil Behaviour
    • The Haydn Scale and ‘The Right to Learn’
    • Levels of Control
    • Links to the research
    • How to get the class quiet; what do teachers say?
    • ‘Coping’; how do teachers handle things when they are not in complete control?
    • It isn’t quick or easy…
    • Sending pupils out; what do teachers say?
    • Moving pupils; what do teachers say?
    • Classroom rules; what do teachers say?
    • Why do some teachers become better than others at managing pupil behaviour? What do teachers say?
    • Complex and sophisticated skills
    • Mistakes: what do mentors say?
    • Zero tolerance: what (some) heads and deputies say…
    • Some of the Variables that influence Classroom Climate
    • Refusal
    • What use is the Scale?
    • Links to Other Useful Resources
  • NEET in Norfolk
  • Pupil Disaffection
  • Blog
  • Contact
You are here: Home / PGCE History at UEA / Empathy / An example

An example

Wineburg and Fournier (1994) use the following extract to make a point about empathy or as they refer to it, “contextualised thinking” in history.

The extract is a quote from a speech by Abraham Lincoln. Wineburg and Fournier invite students “to consider these words of the man often referred to as ‘The Great Emancipator’, on the topic of race relations:

“I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is a physical difference between the two, which in my judgement will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I am in favor of the race to which I belong, having the superior position. I have never said anything to the contrary.”

Abraham Lincoln (pub. 1989) Speeches and writings, Vols 1 and 2, New York, Library of America

Wineburg and Fournier go on to provide further information about the speech:

“We cannot separate Lincoln’s words… from the occasion in which they were uttered (a debate with Stephen A. Douglas for a fiercely contested senatorial seat), the location of this debate (Ottowa, IL., a hotbed of anti-black sentiment), the kinds of people who heard the debate (largely supportive of Douglas and suspicious of Lincoln), and the fact that both Lincoln and Douglas addressed these people not as prophets or moralists, but as candidates courting votes…. But other forms of context – the climate of opinion, mentalite or zeitgeist; the biography of a complex human being and his style with words and utterances; the linguistic meanings of words in the 1850s- must also be considered when thinking about the meaning of Lincoln’s words.” (Wineburg and Fournier, 1994, p. 287)

If we look at empathy as “contextualised thinking”, and not “imaginative thinking”; are we not saying much more than what people believe and say and do is influenced by time and place?

If you are interested in empathy, I would strongly recommend trying to get hold of the article from which the quote was taken (see Reading).

Copyright © 2025 | Terry Haydn | All Rights Reserved